Have a few questions/potential bugs however (apologies for the amount, wanted to get those I could remember written down before I forgot them);
1. Do the devs actually read to and implement the issues raised by customers? (reading the forums I get the unfortunately impression this is not the case, so thought I'd ask to clarify)
2. Any chance the password spec can be improved? (increase of max permitted chars (at least 300) and of course, allowing special chars without it messing up the ability to login to the router) (critically important from a security POV)
3. UI re-write (not exactly clean at present, which makes things more confusing than they have to be (setting up VLANs for example)*
4. Specifically to do with VLANs, allowing them to be setup on the same page instead of requiring two different pages be visited*
5. Built in switch capability (yes two devices are best for this, but would make things much easier)
6. Log out option (appears to be missing, which means you're never actually logged out until you've closed the shell (browser) - closing the tab isn't enough)
7. For some reason, pointing One-to-One NAT to a switch and/or another router, fails (no error, but connection fails) - it has to be pointed directly at a server (not happy about this) before it'll actually work??
8. Fix One-to-One NAT can't be pointed toward a VLAN (regardless of Exceptional Rule Group setting)
9. When configuring options associated with WAN Interface, perhaps a separate "duplicate to other interfaces" ? (saves having to manually create them twice
)And of course, at least twice the amount of LAN ports (am willing to pay more for it) and increase of existing ports from 100Mbps to 100MBps
I'd also love to see an 8800 version of the 7800DX and VDOX
* At present, the VLAN config is a little of a mess and far too convoluted (one page to configure the port (Interface Grouping), then another that is confusingly named (Exceptional Rule Group), to set up the group - which itself is confusing as there's at least 8 group options despite there not being enough ports to support this? (may be missing something here that just confuses me about there being more groups than ports (as far as I can tell from playing with it, you need to dedicate a port before the VLAN will actually work)?) - as they're both LAN, they should be on the LAN menu, not LAN and NAT (NAT itself should technically be under LAN, but that's just me))
