Page 1 of 1

New 2.32e firmware slower than Hub 5

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:21 pm
by Eddman
Hi

Flashed my 8800AXL today and to my surprise lost nearly 3 mbs of speed !!
It went 68.86 down to 66.1mbs not what I wanted to see.
Nothing else had changed and my line is a very stable connection on New cab installed 3 weeks ago and I am the only one one it.
In fact I am the only one on 5 miles of new BT back bone to main exchange, so not problems with congestion!.

Put Home hub 5 back on and went back to 68.8mbs

Factory reset router and made no difference and reflashed.

So will give it a day if not will have to go back to old firmware, bit disappointed that its going down and not up or even staying the same.
:(

Phillip

Stats below

ine Coding (Trellis) On On
SNR Margin (dB) 5.6 6.8
Attenuation (dB) 20.7 0.0
Output Power (dBm) 14.0 7.5
Attainable Rate (Kbps) 77750 20678
Rate (Kbps) 66111 19999
B (# of bytes in Mux Data Frame) 51 237
M (# of Mux Data Frames in an RS codeword) 1 1
T (# of Mux Data Frames in an OH sub-frame) 64 42
R (# of redundancy bytes in the RS codeword) 12 16
S (# of data symbols over which the RS code word spans) 0.0250 0.3781
L (# of bits transmitted in each data symbol) 20520 5374
D (interleaver depth) 1297 1
I (interleaver block size in bytes) 64 127
N (RS codeword size) 64 254
Delay (msec) 8 0
INP (DMT symbol) 3.00 0.00
OH Frames 324362 129998
OH Frame Errors 0 2
RS Words 82878437 1196918
RS Correctable Errors 17094 7
RS Uncorrectable Errors 0 0
HEC Errors 0

Re: New 2.32e firmware slower than Hub 5

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:30 pm
by Eddman
Just to add my Home Hub 5 is the much sort after B model using a Bbroadcom chip set and its a Huawei Cab 800m from me

So should be no difference in speed, I would have thought the Billion should have been better if anything?

Phillip

Re: New 2.32e firmware slower than Hub 5

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 10:57 am
by tman24
Planning on upgrading my 8800axl to the new firmware as well. I did notice a speed improvement when moving from a 7800N + BT VHDSL modem to an 8800axl with integrated modem, so I hope I don't see a drop too. I bought this because Billion has been great, and this model uses the Broadcom chipset, which is just about the best out there. I'll report back when I've done the update.

Re: New 2.32e firmware slower than Hub 5

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:17 am
by billion_fan
Eddman wrote:Just to add my Home Hub 5 is the much sort after B model using a Bbroadcom chip set and its a Huawei Cab 800m from me

So should be no difference in speed, I would have thought the Billion should have been better if anything?

Phillip
Let us know how you get on with the older firmware

Re: New 2.32e firmware slower than Hub 5

Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:36 pm
by Eddman
Hi Billion Fan

Ok put old firmware back on and it dropped even lower 65mb,I did a restore to get all my old setting back not sure if that is causing and issue.
put on Hub 5 B and now back to 67Mb

I will leave BT hub 5 on for a few days and see if the dlm recovers, think all the reboots is dropping the speed, not sure why the billion is slower ?
Once that has been on for a while I will do a flash to new firmware but not restore setting and see if that makes any difference.
Any idea why the billion is slower than the Hub 5 as they both use Broadcom chip sets?.

I have dslstats running 24/7 for last couple of weeks if you should need them.


So not sure why BT Hub 5 is beating Billion hands down

Also saw some strange dips on the new firmware on up load did the test 3 or 4 times and same on all of them
Billion new 2.32e
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 5466492464

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 7990330150

Hub 5
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 1134287175

Old Billion Old 2.32d.dh65
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 6852178099

OK on Hub 5 and old firmware.

Home Hub5b
Product Name: HomeHub5

Firmware version: v0.07.03.0814-BT (Type B) Last updated [Unknown]
4. Board version: 01
5. VDSL uptime: 0 days, 06:27:06
6. Data Rate: 18620 / 67293
7. Maximum Data Rate: 20019 / 81002
8. Noise Margin: 6.7 / 6.3
9. Line Attenuation: 0.0 / 20.6
10. Signal Attenuation: 0.0 / 0.0
11. Data sent/received: 206.0 MB / 496.3 MB


Billion
Software Version 2.32d.dh65
xDSL
Mode VDSL2
Traffic Type PTM
Status Up
Link Power State L0
Downstream Upstream
Line Coding (Trellis) On On
SNR Margin (dB) 5.6 5.3
Attenuation (dB) 20.7 0.0
Output Power (dBm) 14.0 7.5
Attainable Rate (Kbps) 76942 18280
Rate (Kbps) 65742 19999
B (# of bytes in Mux Data Frame) 51 237
M (# of Mux Data Frames in an RS codeword) 1 1
T (# of Mux Data Frames in an OH sub-frame) 64 42
R (# of redundancy bytes in the RS codeword) 12 16
S (# of data symbols over which the RS code word spans) 0.0252 0.3781
L (# of bits transmitted in each data symbol) 20344 5374
D (interleaver depth) 1287 1
I (interleaver block size in bytes) 64 127
N (RS codeword size) 64 254
Delay (msec) 8 0
INP (DMT symbol) 3.00 0.00
OH Frames 32555589 13183336
OH Frame Errors 14 127
RS Words 4039106672 2870552
RS Correctable Errors 787658 389
RS Uncorrectable Errors 32 0
HEC Errors 4 0
OCD Errors 0 0
LCD Errors 0 0
Total Cells 2360396276 0
Data Cells 10212930 0
Bit Errors 0 0
Total ES 5 116
Total SES 0 0
Total UAS 79 79

Re: New 2.32e firmware slower than Hub 5

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 9:39 am
by billion_fan
Eddman wrote:Hi Billion Fan

Ok put old firmware back on and it dropped even lower 65mb,I did a restore to get all my old setting back not sure if that is causing and issue.
put on Hub 5 B and now back to 67Mb

I will leave BT hub 5 on for a few days and see if the dlm recovers, think all the reboots is dropping the speed, not sure why the billion is slower ?
Once that has been on for a while I will do a flash to new firmware but not restore setting and see if that makes any difference.
Any idea why the billion is slower than the Hub 5 as they both use Broadcom chip sets?.

I have dslstats running 24/7 for last couple of weeks if you should need them.


So not sure why BT Hub 5 is beating Billion hands down

Also saw some strange dips on the new firmware on up load did the test 3 or 4 times and same on all of them
Billion new 2.32e
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 5466492464

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 7990330150

Hub 5
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 1134287175

Old Billion Old 2.32d.dh65
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest ... 6852178099

OK on Hub 5 and old firmware.

Home Hub5b
Product Name: HomeHub5

Firmware version: v0.07.03.0814-BT (Type B) Last updated [Unknown]
4. Board version: 01
5. VDSL uptime: 0 days, 06:27:06
6. Data Rate: 18620 / 67293
7. Maximum Data Rate: 20019 / 81002
8. Noise Margin: 6.7 / 6.3
9. Line Attenuation: 0.0 / 20.6
10. Signal Attenuation: 0.0 / 0.0
11. Data sent/received: 206.0 MB / 496.3 MB


Billion
Software Version 2.32d.dh65
xDSL
Mode VDSL2
Traffic Type PTM
Status Up
Link Power State L0
Downstream Upstream
Line Coding (Trellis) On On
SNR Margin (dB) 5.6 5.3
Attenuation (dB) 20.7 0.0
Output Power (dBm) 14.0 7.5
Attainable Rate (Kbps) 76942 18280
Rate (Kbps) 65742 19999
B (# of bytes in Mux Data Frame) 51 237
M (# of Mux Data Frames in an RS codeword) 1 1
T (# of Mux Data Frames in an OH sub-frame) 64 42
R (# of redundancy bytes in the RS codeword) 12 16
S (# of data symbols over which the RS code word spans) 0.0252 0.3781
L (# of bits transmitted in each data symbol) 20344 5374
D (interleaver depth) 1287 1
I (interleaver block size in bytes) 64 127
N (RS codeword size) 64 254
Delay (msec) 8 0
INP (DMT symbol) 3.00 0.00
OH Frames 32555589 13183336
OH Frame Errors 14 127
RS Words 4039106672 2870552
RS Correctable Errors 787658 389
RS Uncorrectable Errors 32 0
HEC Errors 4 0
OCD Errors 0 0
LCD Errors 0 0
Total Cells 2360396276 0
Data Cells 10212930 0
Bit Errors 0 0
Total ES 5 116
Total SES 0 0
Total UAS 79 79
It does seem like DLM is kicking in, but I haven't seen any others with slower speeds when using the 8880 series compared with the Bt Home hub. (If g.inp is enabled the speeds should be even better)

Re: New 2.32e firmware slower than Hub 5

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:14 pm
by Eddman
G.inp is off and has been off since the start, according to dslstats, not sure if its enabled on Cab or line does not need it. Its a new cab only been on line 1 month so would have thought it had been enabled but who knows OR

Phillip